Skip to main content

The Underlying Problem with Young Americans For Liberty

  The Underlying Problem with Young Americans For Liberty   Derrell McIver Warning: This article includes discussion and description of sexual harassment.   “Political power is not being chummy with politicians. To effect real change, you have to threaten a politician's power.” -anonymous This is a very difficult article for me to write. Going into college, I did not know how of any political organization that shared my values of Liberty. That was until I helped in the founding of a Young Americans for Liberty chapter and became a dues-paying-member. After a brief interest in the Libertarian Party, I realized that YAL and its associated organizations were the best chance we have at seeing Liberty in politics in our lifetimes. Some people will read this article and call it “cancel culture.” That is not the intent. For that very reason, I have not included the name of the sexual harasser. Instead he will be given the name ‘John’. My goal here is to call out the leaders

Finding Your Voice




Here we go again. Another article I’m writing because of a situation that happened recently. I swear, I have some half finished stuff and other ideas that are just sitting in my docs. Maybe this is just how the format will go. Something happens, and I come here to vent. Hey, it's cheaper than therapy.

Anyway, I went out to the bar the other night with my wife around 10 p.m. Something we rarely do anymore. I’m the guy who leaves the bar way before 10. But my wife wanted to see a friend she hasn't seen in a while. We get there and local pod. is all over the bar. It doesn't take long for my wife to say something to her friend akin to, “oh, my husband hates the police.” I'll give you 3 guesses what happens next, but you probably one need one. Yes, my wife’s friend starts up a conversation with one of the cops. Well, after a little awkwardness, we enjoyed the rest of night and got home way too late.

This stuff happens all the time to me. I have a bunch of family and friends in the business of violating rights. Lots of awkward moments. I never shy away from the topic of liberty, but I found that I’d become more reserved. Sometimes, I got angry with myself for not being more assertive. I use to think I was a fraud.


I constantly think of the repercussions of my conversations. Will this person never speak to me again? Will that person no longer be friends with my wife because of me? How will this affect my job? If remaining quiet at every turn makes me a fraud, can I accept that? The answer is no, but can I balance my personality with my beliefs and views?

Maybe I was a fraud, or maybe a better word is scared. Not just on this topic either. On many of the staples of libertarianism. I felt like I flew my flag in secret sometimes because I wasn't starting arguments every chance I got. To be fair I sometimes even hid my views. People made me think I was an extremist, crazy, or wanted to see the world burn. I was always in fear of being judged for my political views instead of being judged for who I am as a person; and fearing what type of impact that would have on my life both socially, and professionally.

As I came into my own, I became more outraged with the way things are and I started to speak up. Started to find my voice. I realized my style was more of the low key, lets talk about it type. A friend recently told me its best sometimes to give the statists their steak in bite size pieces until they are ready to sit down for dinner.

This style isn't for everyone - we need people to be out front and yelling, but I also feel like we need people like me. I try and argue the simple points, the most obvious points. If I can get them to see things from a new angle, then maybe they’ll come back for more. I fly my flag proudly now, and I'll talk to anyone (who wants to listen) about human rights issues. But I do it in my own style, and I no longer feel like the fraud I once thought I was.


When preaching the cause of liberty, my go to argument is this:

I don’t believe in crimes that don't have victims. I believe they are unconstitutional. I believe that people who choose an occupation violating these rights, are choosing to do just that. This makes them as bad as the laws they’re enforcing. By some accounts, the police are the criminals, and we are the victim of their extortion.

That’s just my icebreaker. An opener. What I really want to say has more to do with killing dogs, domestic violence rates and shooting innocent people. My hope is that my initial comment is that first bite of steak, and maybe, it will be good enough to make the statists want to sit down for dinner.


~Marcelo

Side note: Little Brother is a great book by Corey Doctorow which has similar concepts going on. His main character Marcus Yallow, struggles with doing and saying what he believes in and the consequences that my come with it. It involves much more exciting and extreme shit, but still it's a great read and I recommend it. In the same series I would also recommend a follow up book called Homeland.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear America, I Won't Be Locking Down

Dear America I won’t be locking down, not that I ever did. And I don’t care about the arbitrary mandates of a geriatric pedophile with a history of dementia. I don’t wear the muzzle or social distance. Nor do I have any plans to start. I won’t be avoiding friends or family & I actively seek out large public gatherings. Needless to say, it’ll be a cold, cold day in hell before the government injects my living body with a foreign substance or keeps me from my family on Thanksgiving Day. You see, I knew from day one that COVID was a hoax. More specifically, when videos of Chinese people dropping dead in the streets were being broadcasted by Western propaganda outlets, it became clear this was essentially a soft coup. As a general rule, anything coming from the CCP should immediately be assumed to be intentionally falsified for malicious purposes. Friends, what has happened is obvious. The political cartel has manufactured a virus because fear enables them to seize power & furthers

Against the LP

Agorism has no room for politics.  The Agora & political institutions can coexist no more than a state of marriage & bachelorhood can coexist. Counter-economics & politicking are likewise mutually exclusive. Frankly, it should seem obvious that engaging in politics & anti-politics is contradictory & self-defeating. It wouldn’t make much sense to get chemo in the morning & smoke a pack of Marlboros in the evening, so why would one seek to destroy the government today, and empower it tomorrow?  Just as a chemist who tests a logically inconsistent theory will experience failure, so too will social scientists & revolutionaries experience failure when they pursue inconsistent theories.  Note that without exception - every gain made by the liberty community in the past 15 years has been produced by the counter-economy & that no other faction of our movement can claim even a small victory . Here’s a brief look at the scoreboard: Whereas the LP & small gov

Technological Agorism I: Digital Feudalism

We live in the age of digital feudalism. In earlier times, peasants saw their productive capital rerouted to their feudal lords. Likewise, we modern serfs see the monetary value of our digital presence being rerouted to big tech CEOs. And just as medieval lords used this capital to maintain their elaborate manors & their status in the nobility (thru kickbacks to the monarch), these modern day lords do precisely the same. The advent of tokenization promises to change this. Big tech has profited enormously from the digital peasantry in two ways.  They earn money based on the popularity of user-generated content. In other words, we use FB, Twitter, & IG to view content posted not by these companies, but by the individuals who use their platforms. Big tech collects & monetizes our personal data & has been doing so for quite some time. Own Your Content The tokenization of digital content has already started the process of disrupting legacy business