Skip to main content

That Bread is Mine, Too

Okay, so the State was smashed yesterday morning. Now what?

Obviously, everybody will go his/her own way and make oodles of gold. Some of it will be spent on protection agents and arbitration. And we shall be ever-vigilant against the return of the State!

But what are we going to do if someone wants his money back?

Such a question is far from academic, for one’s view of justice seems to determine one’s revolutionary tactics. Robert LeFevre, the anarcho-pacifist, pursues a purely educational route because he has foresworn the use of defensive restitutive force. What else can he do? Murray Rothbard, enamored with “temporary” political expedients, pursues popular fronts with rightists, then leftists, then partyarchs. With his “double restitution” or “restitution plus punishment” theory, he finds himself allied with the Penal Institution crowd regardless of other alliances.

Ayn Rand seeks unlimited restitution, and since infinity can only be achieved mystically she must resurrect a gover…

Milton William Cooper: Behold a Pale Horse | Book Review

Conspiracy theories play an elementary role in the pursuit of truth. After all, they tend to arise from speculation in cases with lack of information or holes in the story in order to make sense of the world based on what one already knows or think one knows. Some of these are rather easy to debunk theoretically (such as the flat earth theory's irreconcilability with gravity), but many are more difficult to completely refute, perhaps because of a lack of information or the theory being a half-truth where its hard to separate fact and fiction.

Investigating and thinking out conspiracy theories can be a challenging psychological exercise, and some of them can be pretty stressful to consider the plausibility of (such as corrupt and outright evil conduct by the elites), where it's potential truth (or lack thereof) is especially significant.

Milton William Cooper - Wikipedia
Milton William Cooper

In Behold a Pale Horse, Milton William Cooper outlines a number of significant conspiracy theories: secret societies, the New World Order, FEMA camps, US army connection with the satanic church, aliens and UFOs, the US government utilizing drugs as weapons against their own citizens, and many more. Many - if not most of these - may sound absurd to the average reader, but Cooper is humble in his understanding that not everyone would blindly accept everything he says. He writes, "It is possible that one or more conclusions may be wrong. The purpose of this book is to convince you (the reader) that something is terribly wrong. It is my hope that this work will inspire you to begin an earnest search for truth. Your conclusions may be different but together we can build a better world."

Cooper made a good call in dedicating the first thirty pages in the foreword to delineate his history as a Vietnam veteran who had been in both the Air Force and the Navy and acquired Top Secret clearance to many classified documents he recalls further on in the book. This really builds up his ethos well to make the content more "consumable" for the skeptical reader. He also documents how he became targeted by government officials after he left the military due to attempts of leaking information to journalists and the like, and claims there to have been numerous assassination attempts against him, as well as financial and psychological efforts to stop him.

He died at the age of 58 in November 2001 after a shooting with Apache County deputies trying to arrest him on "charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and endangerment stemming from disputes with local residents in July and September," and had vowed in 1998 that "he would not be taken alive" for the charge of tax evasion. Some have since theorized that his death was related to his prediction of the 9/11 attacks and that bin Laden would be presented at its perpetrator, given the two events being so close in time, and that the deputies knew what would happen in this confrontation, but I'll let you make your mind up on that for yourself (note: documents attained through FOIA requests post-humously has shown that FBI had Cooper under surveillance).

FBI file of Cooper

Many claims in Behold a Pale Horse should be taken with a grain of salt, but it's a good starting point to become familiar with the contents, documentation and the mode of thinking behind conspiracy theories, from which one can further investigate if one has the time and interest. Many conspiracy theories have turned out to be true (see: Why the State Revels in Crises, 25 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out to be True20 insane conspiracy theories that actually turned out to be true7 bizarre conspiracy theories that are actually true, and many more results coming up by searching some variety of "conspiracy theories that turned out to be true"). I'd therefore recommend reading Cooper's Behold a Pale Horse with an open - but critical - mind, and see whether you think his arguments and documentation is enough to at least start to question the official narrative. Good luck in your search for truth. Again: "Your conclusions may be different but together we can build a better world." Sapere aude!

Stefan M. Kløvning is a Norwegian student discussing political, economic, and philosophical matters from an Austro-Libertarian perspective on his blog MisesRevived.


  1. Look up the case of William Morgan. It is about Freemasonry. Bill mentions it in his book, but he misses an important date in history.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Economics of BTC Maximalism

BTC maximalism is a flawed doctrine, fallacious in numerous respects. 

First, if you'd prefer to hear these arguments in audio, check out this recent episode of ABNP, where @mrpseu & I discused these same topics. 

Also, a qualifier: I'm not capable of making, defending or refuting technical arguments. I'll leave that aspect of the debate to others. My concerns with BTC maximalism are entirely economic and can be divided into four areas. 

Based on the criteria for saleability as laid out by the austrian school, BTC is not the most marketable digital commodity.A lack of portability relative to other cryptocurrencies implies BTC isn't as sound of a commodity. Value storage is a secondary function of money and cannot satisfy the use-value requirement of regression theorem. BTC maximalism lays waste to the Hayekian notion of competition as a discovery procedure. This final point was addressed in detail on episode 50 of The Agora, Crypto-Economics and thus, isn't elabor…

Global Warming & Economics

Libertarians who deny the existence of global warming run the risk of making us all look like a bunch of illiterate fools.

Much like economics, being ignorant of planetology or climate science isn't a crime, but having a "loud and vociferous" opinion on the subject while remaining in a state of ignorance can be a dangerous thing. And frankly, the science behind climate change is elementary.

Sunlight enters our atmosphere and warms our planet. Earth then gives off that heat in the form of infrared radiation (this is the same principle behind those cool goggles our collapsitarian friends have). However, and this is a crucial point - the CO₂ molecules in our atmosphere do not allow IR to easily escape back into space. This is known as the greenhouse effect. As the temperature of the planet increases, polar ice caps melt and eventually surface water will begin to evaporate. Since H₂0 also prevents IR from escaping our atmosphere, the additional water vapor only compounds th…

Don't Vote for Alex

It is 2019 and in Norway, that means county and city-election year. You can vote for me, but this article is all about why you really shouldn't. [1] There are several ways to say 'No'. This is a story about the time I said 'Yes', what I will stay positive to and what I will be negative toward. 

"But it is immoral to support politicians to oppress us because they might relieve us one oppression" - Samuel Edward Konkin III

First of all, there is some explaining to do: In my last article on the New Libertarian I argued that party politics is a waste of time and that you could use that time more productive so this entire piece seems like its contradicting that one. It might, that is up to you to judge for yourself (and if you want a chat I'm very approachable on Twitter), but in my defense, I will highlight two things:

One: I'm not against solution-finding, culture-building or exchange of ideas. I can give no brighter example of this happening than the…