Skip to main content

Weathering With You: An Agorist Perspective

If someone asked you what your favorite emotion was, how do you think you’d answer? For many people, I suspect they would answer “Happiness”, “Joy'', or some variant of exclusively positive emotion. Someone may think more meticulously and answer with “Contentment”, which while a positive emotion has a lot of nuance attached to it. However my answer to that question is what I feel others would consider more orthodox: Bittersweet. Pleasure accompanied by suffering, not exactly most people’s first pick but from my perspective pain is necessary in order to enjoy the pleasure that life gives you. Perhaps I'm over-romanticizing but there’s something to desire from looking back fondly at times where you were hurting and seeing yourself in a better place in the present. Perhaps you finally have moved on from “The one who got away” and can look back on those times with fondness. Perhaps you are sharing stories of a friend or family member at their funeral and though they may never w

A Primer on Homesteading for Agorists




The decision to homestead is similar to a country declaring independence. When America was young, they actually had a pretty decent understanding of freedom. A minuscule tax on tea and stamps and a few cops parking themselves around was all it took for the early Americans to realize “No, you will not rule us, you have no authority here.” Although we suffer far more state intrusion than they ever did and we accept most of it, the most powerful way to subvert their power and reduce their ownership claims on our lives that they can do nothing about, is in adopting the mentality of a homesteader.

Homesteading is typically thought of as a family getting land and living off grid, raising animals and growing plants to produce as much as they can for themselves. In future articles I could expound on why this stereotype exists as it follows naturally from what I am about to tell you if there is interest. I could also go into traditional homesteading content, let me know in the comments what you want to hear about - but for my first article, I think it’s important to go over the absolute basics; something anyone can benefit from.


The shift in consciousness that needs to be made is to declare independence in your life from those who would rule you just as a country would. You are sovereign regardless of what any power would have you think. If you do this, whatever means available to you can be thought of as your homestead. True, the state is present and they do indeed violently prohibit peaceful individuals from doing as they see fit in many cases, but several facts remain: A.) There is no place on earth where you have more freedom and ability to act on your will and participate in the “game of your choosing” as in your own home, even if that freedom is not perfect. Whether that is your apartment, house, or cabin in the country, this is a simple fact. B.) there are some things we can control, and others we can’t. This is also self-evident. As agorists, we seek to use every bit of freedom available to us to further increase freedom for ourselves and for others. Thus, it seems natural that we should leverage the very thing that we can control the most and have the most freedom in, to accomplish this goal. This is the act of homesteading.

Imagine homesteading as declaring independence once again. When the US did this from Britain, they envisioned the future spelled out in the declaration of independence and the constitution. This was a fairly noble goal, even if it turned out not to work. Since it failed and we do not have freedom, we must also declare independence, even if under the radar. The effects that ripple out from this are profound. Your “homestead” exists whether you have declared independence or not. Your homestead can be thought of as all you possess- your life, liberty and property; everything within your direct control that has an effect on your life. If you envision your life or homestead as a business, you would want it to be profitable. Making money via wages is fine, but I believe it resonates in the human heart that producing an actual good that has value, whether that be digital, physical, or otherwise, and “exporting” that good to other homesteads in voluntary exchange is very meaningful.

A way to understand this mentality is to compare it to those “civilization” video games. As the sole decision maker for your country, you want it to be as self-sufficient as possible. Ideally, you would develop the resources available to you so that you do not have to import as much and can export more to make more profit. The best build in a game like this would provide 100% of it’s own needs and create extra to sell to other players. If other people do not want to transact with you, it would be their loss, not yours. We can imagine our lives the same way. Although the 100% self sufficient life is impossible, the more we produce, the less say the state gets on what we do with it, and we can trade with like-minded individuals for the rest. This would be true sovereignty- not accountable to anyone because you can only be controlled indirectly. This is the exact reason why things like 3D printers and crypto are so subversive. The state has no direct control over you.


The effect this way of thinking has on our lives is profound. The mentality of a homesteader is to take stock of your life and ask: 1.) What is something that I want or need- can I produce it myself? If yes, how? If no, how can I get this in as violence free a way as possible? 2.) what is something I can uniquely produce? If there is something, how can I transact with this yield in as free a way from state violence as possible and if there is nothing I currently produce, what can I strive towards? Each individual must provide their own value to the world; this is the secret sauce to making markets flourish. Life is an infinite game, and there are niches to be filled that we can’t even imagine because they don’t even exist yet; they are waiting to be discovered by some entrepreneur who can not accept the way things currently are. We are all called to be that entrepreneur- to create something from nothing and make the world better. Even if it is small, there is some true yield anyone can produce that others will value.

Everything we produce for ourselves in the privacy of our own home is 100% tax free, unregulated, unsupervised, and as free as we want to make it. Everything we trade for with other like-minded individuals is the same. To homestead is to choose to find your place in the “free economy” and ideally, provide for everything you need outside of the auspices of the state paid for with the free market outputs you produce. If we fail to do this, we can only expect to import products tainted with layers upon layers of state violence and theft. Every transaction you make that is regulated, taxed, or otherwise controlled only goes to prop up the state. We cannot accept this.

The reason homesteading is so subversive to the state is obvious: the state can only control you indirectly. They have not yet stolen enough resources to monitor each citizen directly. They can only control you indirectly, by methods they can detect. It’s easy to limit a cooperate box store from selling McNukes™, not so easy to stop a lone black market salesman. The reason is the lone salesmen has offered no exposure- they have chosen to maintain the full privacy of their homestead and offered nothing for the state to scrutinize. If you work with what you can control and where you have to most freedom (your homestead, by definition), then everything that occurs on your homestead, whether that be digital, physical, social or otherwise, will have as much state exposure as you are willing to allow (which hopefully is 0).


It is possible, although difficult, to discover or even create this kind of economy in your life. We must start with declaring our own independence and show others the beauty of this lifestyle by embodying it. We must use whatever means available to us to gain more freedom. As peaceful individuals, no one has the authority to tell us what we can create or import into our homestead. Even the most benign transaction, when performed with a homesteading mentality, echoes freedom throughout our lives and those who we transact with. Homesteading is the most fundamental aspect of agorism and one we can all embrace regardless of position in life.


Be sure to follow the author @m_r_j_smith on Twitter!





Comments

  1. I found this a very helpful reference :
    https://www.peakprosperity.com/what-should-i-do/

    For all those who travel the hard road, you are not alone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent article. I wanted to point out that there is no intrinsic link between imports (to your homestead) and state interference. I don't share your appreciation of self-sufficiency because knowing agorists who can provide what i'm not so good at making allows me to be more productive making what I'm great at making, and this more efficient. "Voluntaryist sufficiency," I think, is a better goal, and the one toward which I strive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Blogger won't let me post as the author of my blog, http://litmocracy.blogspot.com/ so there is the link.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Truth About Global Warming

Libertarians who deny the existence of global warming run the risk of making us all look like a bunch of illiterate fools. Much like economics, being ignorant of planetology or climate science isn't a crime, but having a "loud and vociferous" opinion on the subject while remaining in a state of ignorance can be a dangerous thing. And frankly, the science behind climate change is elementary. Sunlight enters our atmosphere and warms our planet. Earth then gives off that heat in the form of infrared radiation (this is the same principle behind those cool goggles our collapsitarian friends have). However, and this is a crucial point - the CO₂ molecules in our atmosphere do not allow IR to easily escape back into space. This is known as the greenhouse effect. As the temperature of the planet increases, polar ice caps melt and eventually surface water will begin to evaporate. Since H₂0 also prevents IR from escaping our atmosphere, the additional water vapor only compound

The Counter-Economics of COVID

In March 2020 - some say earlier, but by March 2020 at latest - the banking had sector collapsed. In response, coronavirus was manufactured as a scapegoat to justify the liquidity injection necessary to keep the Federal Reserve’s ponzi scheme alive. The State’s narrative would henceforth be: ‘Since all businesses were shut down, an unprecedented amount of money must be printed and distributed to the public.’ Milton Friedman’s helicopter money had come to fruition. But like a junkie chasing his initial high, the Fed had become immune to the effects of monetary stimulus. Each injection requiring a stronger, more potent dose of cheap & easy money. Less than two years later, and the effects of that stimulus have now waned & the banksters are poised to pull off another heist. As the business cycle continues to ebb and flow until the day of final reckoning, the State can be expected to behave in an increasingly erratic fashion. Like a cornered cat, or a fish out of water, the State

The Trouble With Dave Smith

  On the issues, Dave & most agorists can find agreement 99 out of 100 times, but as libertarians we have a habit, a pastime - a duty even, to seek out & argue over the 1% of things we don’t agree on. In keeping with that tradition friends, I've got to tell you, when it comes to strategy, Dave Smith seriously fumbles the ball. The fundamental issue is that @comicdavesmith is interested in creating libertarians, whereas agorists are interested in creating liberty. Dave has a classic case of @perbylund ’s Savior Complex - the irrational desire of individualists to save the collective whole of society. There are lots of problems with this, but even if creating libertarians is a worthy goal, does that mean the Libertarian Party is the best vehicle to accomplish this task? Has anything the Libertarian Party ever done caused even a slight retreat of statism? Dave rightly points to his own success at spreading the message of liberty. It's true, no one - save Ron Paul or Tom