Skip to main content

Against the IFP

Centralizing control over a currency’s infrastructure is a seemingly obvious mistake.

One would think any Austro-libertarian worth their salt would be able to see thru such a charade. Yet here we are, again. Face to face with economic illiteracy. Not garden variety lefist economic illiteracy, but one far more stinging and painful - one which comes from within our own community, rather than from without. 

First, Bitcoiners faced the economic illiteracy of maximalism and small blockers. Attempts to masquerade money’s primary function as value storage (Ammous) or rejecting Menger’s Regression Theorem altogether (Szabo) are luckily demonstrably false. Nevertheless, the shock of our fellow Bitcoiners illiteracy was like an unexpected slap in the face. Suddenly, we were forced to confront the fact that the ignorance of our allies in the fight for sound money, had led them astray. Yet, thru BCH we were thankfully able to keep Satoshi’s dream of peer to peer cash intact. 
Well, crypto anarch…

Illegal Immigration & the Agora

Few people might expect agorism in a brick-and-mortar storefront. Usually, it is difficult, if not impossible, to set up shop in the open. However, one special class of storefronts has seemingly overcome this obstacle: La Tiendas. La Tienda* is, simply put, any Hispanic grocery store. Many sell unfamiliar items like churros or authentic piñatas. Most, though, sell goods that most Americans would be accustomed to such as laundry detergent, bleach, and alcohol. However, brand names will be in Spanish and you might just be able to not 'get IDed.' The first time I walked into la Tienda, I was amazed. Being a law nerd and an agorist, I was in humble awe of the public, if not flashy, display of a non-FDA-approved pandaría (bakery) and carnicería (butchery). And, at the risk of generalizing, it would be foolish to think that all of the workers were "legal" immigrants who submit W2s at the beginning of each year.

What kind of confidence is it to practice such an unashamed kind of free market? My conclusion has been that the nature of "illegal" immigration drives individuals and others around them to a sort of emboldened agorism. Before I continue, let me clarify that I do not use the term either as an insult or as in its true definition. In fact, much of this article will describe the bravery that agorist migration entails. No person can be "illegal," but the state--by its very nature--must declare an 'other.' Our job as agorists should be to break down those barriers whenever possible.

Let us take a second to review the definition of government: a political entity with a monopoly on violence and law over a populace within a defined territory. Particularly, these last two characteristics--populace and territory--are important. The State must exercise control over a defined piece of land. In other words, it must have borders. Without this, people and goods may come and go as they please without any input by the State. That is exactly what agorist immigration accomplishes. It strikes at the very definition of the State, the very heart of its power. Without control over its borders, every aspect of the State is undermined. Agorists bring agorist goods and services into the nation that exponentially multiply the free market's production possibilities. Though, perhaps the most valuable good that is brought is a clear and unambiguous culture of ignoring the State.

With any kind of immigration comes the elimination of government-enforced cultural boundaries. Back to my first visit to la Tienda, there was a sign up on the pastries written in Spanish, a class I barely passed. However, after a simple picture and upload to google translate, I understood what the sign was saying--something along the lines of "help yourself but please use the trays for cleanliness." Immigration does more than encourage market-solutions to language barriers. Of course, Google Translate is not the grey/black market, but an increase in agorist immigrants incentivizes white market firms to lower cross-cultural transaction cost.

When you are used to seeing people wearing hijabs, yamakas, and crucifixes, you're less inclined to believe the State's propaganda that these religions must be fought against or for in endless wars. We start to see each other as individuals deserving of property rights, and the State loses a schism it could previously use to motivate us to support war. If there is any truth in claims that cultural regulation is a true intent of policy--though I suspect immigration laws have much more to do with the later points--then agorist immigration helps to break down cultural divides that would otherwise be advantageous to the State.

Agorist immigrants also force domestic markets to have freer labor. Businesses across the country hire undocumented immigrants for the specific reason that they are undocumented. With no taxes or mandatory compensation, people are free to negotiate a wage that is mutually beneficial to both parties, just as it should be for the whole market. Firms constantly take the risks of fines or sudden labor shortages due to deportations just to avoid burdensome taxes. These lower wages help keep consumer goods at lower prices, despite the government's best efforts to make all of our lives miserable.

Agorist immigrants strike the brutish mouth of the state. A State without a tax revenue is like a vampire without a victim. They not only undermine the State's ability to steal from firms, but also from the smallest minority: the individual. Perhaps in the future everyday goods that would be taxed through tariffs will find their way across borders with agorist immigrants.

Most glaring, however, is that agorist immigrants show just how inept the State is at its one societal duty of providing public goods. It is often said that the State must provide roads and defense because of free riders. It must provide education and healthcare because of positive externalities. It must provide labor and cultural standards because of negative externalities. Yet, agorist immigrants show how the State does not truly solve any of these market issues.

The only thing the State can do is force riders through taxation. It can only hold a gun to its subjects' head to provide what it thinks are positives and prevent what it deems are negatives. These are not solutions, they are subversions. Agorist immigrants show the true face of the State and how it works through threats and violence. And when that violence is avoided by agorist immigrants using roads and public schools, the State is shown to be toothless. When those threats are ignored by agorist immigrants working for below minimum wage, the State is shown to be naked. If left alone, the market would find ways of internalizing these issues--such as Google running ads on a non-excludable and non-rivalrous service. As it stands, the State claims a monopoly on all of these goods, so the market has no had the opportunity to truly solve them.

The very nature of illegal immigration makes it an agorist action. Crossing the border in defiance of the State injures its ability to tax, to regulate labor, to control the imports, and to provide public goods. Wherever there is illegal immigration, there is the agora.

*La Tienda here is used as a general term and does not specify any particular store or person

Derrell McIver | @BenjaminDMyles1


Popular posts from this blog

Global Warming & Economics

Libertarians who deny the existence of global warming run the risk of making us all look like a bunch of illiterate fools.

Much like economics, being ignorant of planetology or climate science isn't a crime, but having a "loud and vociferous" opinion on the subject while remaining in a state of ignorance can be a dangerous thing. And frankly, the science behind climate change is elementary.

Sunlight enters our atmosphere and warms our planet. Earth then gives off that heat in the form of infrared radiation (this is the same principle behind those cool goggles our collapsitarian friends have). However, and this is a crucial point - the CO₂ molecules in our atmosphere do not allow IR to easily escape back into space. This is known as the greenhouse effect. As the temperature of the planet increases, polar ice caps melt and eventually surface water will begin to evaporate. Since H₂0 also prevents IR from escaping our atmosphere, the additional water vapor only compounds th…

Technological Agorism I: Digital Feudalism

We live in the age of digital feudalism.

In earlier times, peasants saw their productive capital rerouted to their feudal lords. Likewise, we modern serfs see the monetary value of our digital presence being rerouted to big tech CEOs. And just as medieval lords used this capital to maintain their elaborate manors & their status in the nobility (thru kickbacks to the monarch), these modern day lords do precisely the same. The advent of tokenization promises to change this.

Big tech has profited enormously from the digital peasantry in two ways. 
They earn money based on the popularity of user-generated content. In other words, we use FB, Twitter, & IG to view content posted not by these companies, but by the individuals who use their platforms. Big tech collects & monetizes our personal data & has been doing so for quite some time. Own Your Content The tokenization of digital content has already started the process of disrupting legacy business models. Seeing as the fir…

The Economics of BTC Maximalism

BTC maximalism is a flawed doctrine, fallacious in numerous respects. 

First, if you'd prefer to hear these arguments in audio, check out this recent episode of ABNP, where @mrpseu & I discused these same topics. 

Also, a qualifier: I'm not capable of making, defending or refuting technical arguments. I'll leave that aspect of the debate to others. My concerns with BTC maximalism are entirely economic and can be divided into four areas. 

Based on the criteria for saleability as laid out by the austrian school, BTC is not the most marketable digital commodity.A lack of portability relative to other cryptocurrencies implies BTC isn't as sound of a commodity. Value storage is a secondary function of money and cannot satisfy the use-value requirement of regression theorem. BTC maximalism lays waste to the Hayekian notion of competition as a discovery procedure. This final point was addressed in detail on episode 50 of The Agora, Crypto-Economics and thus, isn't elabor…