Skip to main content

Weathering With You: An Agorist Perspective

If someone asked you what your favorite emotion was, how do you think you’d answer? For many people, I suspect they would answer “Happiness”, “Joy'', or some variant of exclusively positive emotion. Someone may think more meticulously and answer with “Contentment”, which while a positive emotion has a lot of nuance attached to it. However my answer to that question is what I feel others would consider more orthodox: Bittersweet. Pleasure accompanied by suffering, not exactly most people’s first pick but from my perspective pain is necessary in order to enjoy the pleasure that life gives you. Perhaps I'm over-romanticizing but there’s something to desire from looking back fondly at times where you were hurting and seeing yourself in a better place in the present. Perhaps you finally have moved on from “The one who got away” and can look back on those times with fondness. Perhaps you are sharing stories of a friend or family member at their funeral and though they may never w

Illegal Immigration & the Agora






Few people might expect agorism in a brick-and-mortar storefront. Usually, it is difficult, if not impossible, to set up shop in the open. However, one special class of storefronts has seemingly overcome this obstacle: La Tiendas. La Tienda* is, simply put, any Hispanic grocery store. Many sell unfamiliar items like churros or authentic piñatas. Most, though, sell goods that most Americans would be accustomed to such as laundry detergent, bleach, and alcohol. However, brand names will be in Spanish and you might just be able to not 'get IDed.' The first time I walked into la Tienda, I was amazed. Being a law nerd and an agorist, I was in humble awe of the public, if not flashy, display of a non-FDA-approved pandaría (bakery) and carnicería (butchery). And, at the risk of generalizing, it would be foolish to think that all of the workers were "legal" immigrants who submit W2s at the beginning of each year.


What kind of confidence is it to practice such an unashamed kind of free market? My conclusion has been that the nature of "illegal" immigration drives individuals and others around them to a sort of emboldened agorism. Before I continue, let me clarify that I do not use the term either as an insult or as in its true definition. In fact, much of this article will describe the bravery that agorist migration entails. No person can be "illegal," but the state--by its very nature--must declare an 'other.' Our job as agorists should be to break down those barriers whenever possible.

Let us take a second to review the definition of government: a political entity with a monopoly on violence and law over a populace within a defined territory. Particularly, these last two characteristics--populace and territory--are important. The State must exercise control over a defined piece of land. In other words, it must have borders. Without this, people and goods may come and go as they please without any input by the State. That is exactly what agorist immigration accomplishes. It strikes at the very definition of the State, the very heart of its power. Without control over its borders, every aspect of the State is undermined. Agorists bring agorist goods and services into the nation that exponentially multiply the free market's production possibilities. Though, perhaps the most valuable good that is brought is a clear and unambiguous culture of ignoring the State.

With any kind of immigration comes the elimination of government-enforced cultural boundaries. Back to my first visit to la Tienda, there was a sign up on the pastries written in Spanish, a class I barely passed. However, after a simple picture and upload to google translate, I understood what the sign was saying--something along the lines of "help yourself but please use the trays for cleanliness." Immigration does more than encourage market-solutions to language barriers. Of course, Google Translate is not the grey/black market, but an increase in agorist immigrants incentivizes white market firms to lower cross-cultural transaction cost.

When you are used to seeing people wearing hijabs, yamakas, and crucifixes, you're less inclined to believe the State's propaganda that these religions must be fought against or for in endless wars. We start to see each other as individuals deserving of property rights, and the State loses a schism it could previously use to motivate us to support war. If there is any truth in claims that cultural regulation is a true intent of policy--though I suspect immigration laws have much more to do with the later points--then agorist immigration helps to break down cultural divides that would otherwise be advantageous to the State.




Agorist immigrants also force domestic markets to have freer labor. Businesses across the country hire undocumented immigrants for the specific reason that they are undocumented. With no taxes or mandatory compensation, people are free to negotiate a wage that is mutually beneficial to both parties, just as it should be for the whole market. Firms constantly take the risks of fines or sudden labor shortages due to deportations just to avoid burdensome taxes. These lower wages help keep consumer goods at lower prices, despite the government's best efforts to make all of our lives miserable.

Agorist immigrants strike the brutish mouth of the state. A State without a tax revenue is like a vampire without a victim. They not only undermine the State's ability to steal from firms, but also from the smallest minority: the individual. Perhaps in the future everyday goods that would be taxed through tariffs will find their way across borders with agorist immigrants.


Most glaring, however, is that agorist immigrants show just how inept the State is at its one societal duty of providing public goods. It is often said that the State must provide roads and defense because of free riders. It must provide education and healthcare because of positive externalities. It must provide labor and cultural standards because of negative externalities. Yet, agorist immigrants show how the State does not truly solve any of these market issues.

The only thing the State can do is force riders through taxation. It can only hold a gun to its subjects' head to provide what it thinks are positives and prevent what it deems are negatives. These are not solutions, they are subversions. Agorist immigrants show the true face of the State and how it works through threats and violence. And when that violence is avoided by agorist immigrants using roads and public schools, the State is shown to be toothless. When those threats are ignored by agorist immigrants working for below minimum wage, the State is shown to be naked. If left alone, the market would find ways of internalizing these issues--such as Google running ads on a non-excludable and non-rivalrous service. As it stands, the State claims a monopoly on all of these goods, so the market has no had the opportunity to truly solve them.


The very nature of illegal immigration makes it an agorist action. Crossing the border in defiance of the State injures its ability to tax, to regulate labor, to control the imports, and to provide public goods. Wherever there is illegal immigration, there is the agora.


*La Tienda here is used as a general term and does not specify any particular store or person

Derrell McIver | @BenjaminDMyles1



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Truth About Global Warming

Libertarians who deny the existence of global warming run the risk of making us all look like a bunch of illiterate fools. Much like economics, being ignorant of planetology or climate science isn't a crime, but having a "loud and vociferous" opinion on the subject while remaining in a state of ignorance can be a dangerous thing. And frankly, the science behind climate change is elementary. Sunlight enters our atmosphere and warms our planet. Earth then gives off that heat in the form of infrared radiation (this is the same principle behind those cool goggles our collapsitarian friends have). However, and this is a crucial point - the CO₂ molecules in our atmosphere do not allow IR to easily escape back into space. This is known as the greenhouse effect. As the temperature of the planet increases, polar ice caps melt and eventually surface water will begin to evaporate. Since H₂0 also prevents IR from escaping our atmosphere, the additional water vapor only compound

The Counter-Economics of COVID

In March 2020 - some say earlier, but by March 2020 at latest - the banking had sector collapsed. In response, coronavirus was manufactured as a scapegoat to justify the liquidity injection necessary to keep the Federal Reserve’s ponzi scheme alive. The State’s narrative would henceforth be: ‘Since all businesses were shut down, an unprecedented amount of money must be printed and distributed to the public.’ Milton Friedman’s helicopter money had come to fruition. But like a junkie chasing his initial high, the Fed had become immune to the effects of monetary stimulus. Each injection requiring a stronger, more potent dose of cheap & easy money. Less than two years later, and the effects of that stimulus have now waned & the banksters are poised to pull off another heist. As the business cycle continues to ebb and flow until the day of final reckoning, the State can be expected to behave in an increasingly erratic fashion. Like a cornered cat, or a fish out of water, the State

The Trouble With Dave Smith

  On the issues, Dave & most agorists can find agreement 99 out of 100 times, but as libertarians we have a habit, a pastime - a duty even, to seek out & argue over the 1% of things we don’t agree on. In keeping with that tradition friends, I've got to tell you, when it comes to strategy, Dave Smith seriously fumbles the ball. The fundamental issue is that @comicdavesmith is interested in creating libertarians, whereas agorists are interested in creating liberty. Dave has a classic case of @perbylund ’s Savior Complex - the irrational desire of individualists to save the collective whole of society. There are lots of problems with this, but even if creating libertarians is a worthy goal, does that mean the Libertarian Party is the best vehicle to accomplish this task? Has anything the Libertarian Party ever done caused even a slight retreat of statism? Dave rightly points to his own success at spreading the message of liberty. It's true, no one - save Ron Paul or Tom