Skip to main content

The Trouble With Dave Smith

  On the issues, Dave & most agorists can find agreement 99 out of 100 times, but as libertarians we have a habit, a pastime - a duty even, to seek out & argue over the 1% of things we don’t agree on. In keeping with that tradition friends, I've got to tell you, when it comes to strategy, Dave Smith seriously fumbles the ball. The fundamental issue is that @comicdavesmith is interested in creating libertarians, whereas agorists are interested in creating liberty. Dave has a classic case of @perbylund ’s Savior Complex - the irrational desire of individualists to save the collective whole of society. There are lots of problems with this, but even if creating libertarians is a worthy goal, does that mean the Libertarian Party is the best vehicle to accomplish this task? Has anything the Libertarian Party ever done caused even a slight retreat of statism? Dave rightly points to his own success at spreading the message of liberty. It's true, no one - save Ron Paul or Tom

Against the LP

Agorism has no room for politics. 

The Agora & political institutions can coexist no more than a state of marriage & bachelorhood can coexist. Counter-economics & politicking are likewise mutually exclusive. Frankly, it should seem obvious that engaging in politics & anti-politics is contradictory & self-defeating. It wouldn’t make much sense to get chemo in the morning & smoke a pack of Marlboros in the evening, so why would one seek to destroy the government today, and empower it tomorrow? 

Just as a chemist who tests a logically inconsistent theory will experience failure, so too will social scientists & revolutionaries experience failure when they pursue inconsistent theories.  Note that without exception - every gain made by the liberty community in the past 15 years has been produced by the counter-economy & that no other faction of our movement can claim even a small victory. Here’s a brief look at the scoreboard:

Whereas the LP & small government types couldn’t even get an audit of the Fed passed, in 2008, Satoshi Nakamoto’s White Paper brought an end to the Fed’s counterfeiting operation & currency controls in one, irreversible, fell swoop. Then in 2011, Ross Ulbricht combined Satoshi’s work with J. Neil Schulman’s agorist manifesto, Alongside Night, to give us the first truly free market mankind has ever known - a feat the unelectable, wannabe warlords from the Libertarian Party could only ever dream of accomplishing. A couple years later, in 2013, Cody Wilson did with his 3D printer what hundreds of millions of dollars in donations to “small government” politicians & gun-rights interest groups could never do: bring decisive & irreversible closure to the gun control debate. 

Not to mention, in 2008, entrepreneurs successfully disintermediated the cartelized hotel industry when they created AirBNB. A year later the state was sent into a similar frenzy when other entrepreneurs did the same to the taxi cartels & founded Uber. And of course, lest we forget, during this same time, massive waves of non-compliance & civil disobedience forced western states to ease drug laws.

And we're not done.

Soon, privacy coins & decentralized exchanges will free us from the burden of taxation altogether. Agorists will fix the broken health care system using medical tokens. We will eliminate the SEC's cartel of brokers, FINRA, using tokenized securities & assets, unleashing a wave of capital and innovation unlike anything the world has ever seen.

What victories can the LP claim? The secessionists? How about the boog bois? What have any of these groups done other than deprive the counter-economy of precious resources? Every dollar spent on the LP is a dollar not spent on subversion. Every moment spent promoting their failed ideology is a moment not spent promoting counter-economics. And every hour spent canvassing a neighborhood or working a phone bank, is an hour not spent onboarding merchants to crypto, selling locally grown food, or performing some other counter-economic task. 

Why Not Both?

Some may wonder, why not both? They fail to realize that nothing about the current state of affairs suggests that we have the luxury of wasting resources on inconsistent, failed approaches.

Others say the party should serve as a platform for the message, but one can’t spread the message of liberty while politicking anymore than one can promote property rights while robbing houses. When the goalposts are moved from ending all political institutions to tolerating those we find agreeable, we reduce ourselves to negotiating with state terrorists, or worse, we become them. 

To the agorist, this is an unacceptable blunder. Now more than ever, is the time for unity under the black & grey banner. We're all faced with a clear choice: Join the counter-economy or die in the clutches of state terror.

But What About Ron Paul?

That Ron Paul was so obviously the best candidate in both 2008 & 2012 and was nevertheless railroaded in an underhanded fashion, only proves the inefficacy of political attempts to limit government. Note that the state will allow one Ron Paul, or Thomas Massie, but never two...


  1. This blog was very nicely formatted; it maintained a flow from the first word to the last.
    tom hardy dunkirk jacket


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear America, I Won't Be Locking Down

Dear America I won’t be locking down, not that I ever did. And I don’t care about the arbitrary mandates of a geriatric pedophile with a history of dementia. I don’t wear the muzzle or social distance. Nor do I have any plans to start. I won’t be avoiding friends or family & I actively seek out large public gatherings. Needless to say, it’ll be a cold, cold day in hell before the government injects my living body with a foreign substance or keeps me from my family on Thanksgiving Day. You see, I knew from day one that COVID was a hoax. More specifically, when videos of Chinese people dropping dead in the streets were being broadcasted by Western propaganda outlets, it became clear this was essentially a soft coup. As a general rule, anything coming from the CCP should immediately be assumed to be intentionally falsified for malicious purposes. Friends, what has happened is obvious. The political cartel has manufactured a virus because fear enables them to seize power & furthers

In Defense of Left Libertarianism

Marx was right, but Marxism is stupid. Let me explain… Marx’s fundamental critique that the working class is being exploited by the upper class is true. This is so inherently obvious in the modern political climate that I find it bewildering the notion even needs defending. In fact, today, the working class has been so thoroughly exploited that they can now be more accurately termed the working poor . Go to Manhattan, the neoliberal shithole from whence I came - and try to find a worker who both lives & resides there. You can’t. There aren’t any. The elites have successfully used a combination of high taxes & a denial of civil liberties to expel the working class from their homes. Trust me, I am among the expelled. The anarcho-capitalist habit of turning a blind eye to class theory is a grave mistake, as it sweeps real concerns under the rug. In doing so they dismiss the plight of an enormous contingent of the public - labor. No, we agorists aren’t seeking an abandonment of met