Skip to main content

WTF Crypto-Anarchy??

Crypto-anarchism is a political ideology that advocates the use of cryptography and other technologies to protect individual privacy, freedom, and autonomy from state interference. Crypto-anarchists believe that by encrypting their communications and transactions, we can create a decentralized and voluntary society that is immune to censorship, surveillance, and taxation. The term crypto-anarchism was coined by Timothy C. May in his 1988 "Crypto Anarchist Manifesto", where he declared: "Crypto Anarchy is the cyberspatial realization of anarchism, transcending national boundaries and freeing individuals to make the economic arrangements they wish, consensually." May was one of the founders of the cypherpunk movement, a group of activists and hackers who promoted the use of cryptography and digital currencies to challenge the authority of governments and corporations. The cypherpunks were influenced by libertarian and anarchist thinkers such as Murray Rothbard, David

The Underlying Problem with Young Americans For Liberty


The Underlying Problem with Young Americans For Liberty


Derrell McIver

Warning: This article includes discussion and description of sexual harassment.


“Political power is not being chummy with politicians. To effect real change, you have to threaten a politician's power.” -anonymous

This is a very difficult article for me to write. Going into college, I did not know how of any political organization that shared my values of Liberty. That was until I helped in the founding of a Young Americans for Liberty chapter and became a dues-paying-member. After a brief interest in the Libertarian Party, I realized that YAL and its associated organizations were the best chance we have at seeing Liberty in politics in our lifetimes.

Some people will read this article and call it “cancel culture.” That is not the intent. For that very reason, I have not included the name of the sexual harasser. Instead he will be given the name ‘John’. My goal here is to call out the leaders of Young Americans because I believe that its leaders can genuinely change for the better.

The problem with YAL began on a campaign that I worked on under the leadership of Justin Greiss, YAL’s President of Grassroots. Greiss has also been the lead on Operation Win at the Door. My direct supervisor--and Greiss’s underling--attempted to have an unwanted sexual relationship with my coworker, Alexandra. I witnessed inappropriate and clearly unwanted flirting, both verbal and physical. The harassment started early on. Alexandra said that John was immediately flirty, even before the job started. John apparently singled out Alexandra to drive back to the place we stayed at for the campaign. During this ride, he made unsolicited comments about Tinder, finding and “super-liking” Alexandra’s profile. He told her to raise her age on the app so that she could also find his profile, something she did not feel comfortable rejecting because of the pressure he put on her. Alexandra says that she realized then that this would be a major issue.

Within the first few days, Alexandra and John were in the house alone after a day of work. Alexandra says that when she came out of her bedroom, John was changing in his room with the door open. She says that they made, “direct eye contact because the rooms [were] right across from each other. And he just stare[d] at me and winked while he’s getting undressed.” Alexandra said that when one of the other coworkers got home, she “had never been so thankful to see someone come through a door.”

John would also make comments about Alexandra’s body and appearance. He defended other men when Alexandra said they stared at her breast. He regularly insisted that she come back to his room and attempted to sext with her.  He would also enter the girls’ rooms unannounced and drunk. One time, he said it was rude to not invite him to the girls’ movie night. He began playing with Alexandra’s hair and touching her shoulders despite her saying that she did not want him in their room. When I asked her about these actions, she said they “made me uncomfortable with being a girl.” She noted that his regular drunkenness made her especially uncomfortable. John would continue to persist to not allow Alexandra time to be alone. These daily inappropriate actions caused anxiety for Alexandra.

After a while, the stress and harassment from this unwanted attention caused her to abruptly leave the campaign.  Alexandra says that she was “in constant fear that something was going to happen to me” and that “I did not know what to do since he was my boss.” One of the last nights she was at the house, she was on the phone with her sister--telling her about how scared and uncomfortable she was--and John came in and touched her shoulders while saying he was there for her if she needed to talk. “He started to drink more,” which caused Alexandra to get very scared about what could happen. After weeks of harassment, Alexandra had to abruptly leave the campaign to escape the threatening situation. Alexandra also emailed YAL and OWD leadership to report the harassment when she resigned.

While Alexandra’s experience on the first half of the campaign was horrible, at the time I believed that it was a fluke. Clearly a group of people so devoted to Liberty would not tolerate harassment in the workplace. This was confirmed to me and others by the immediate actions of YAL’s leaders. John was forced to resign and left a few days after Alexandra. New rules were established to prevent any more harassment and there were reassurances from leaders--including Griess himself--that employees could come to them for situations like this. The rest of us finished the campaign with a new vigor, believing that the issue was resolved.

That was until I began working for Mobilize the Message. Mobilize is a somewhat separate Liberty organization, but Justin Griess is one of its leaders. When I began work for them, my immediate boss was John: the person who had harassed my coworker, Alexandra. I was shocked. How could Griess allow the same person to have a similar influence over employees? Alexandra had the same questions when asked about her thoughts on the rehiring of a known sexual harasser:

I think it's really disrespectful and ridiculous. He's not in charge of people in the sense that he's living in the same house [like he was during the campaign], so hopefully he won't harass again. But it looks so bad for this fantastic organization just because they can't fire a dude who harassed his employees.

Alexandra, though, did not even have the same initial reassurances as I did from leadership. At a different event a couple months after the campaign, Alexandra says that, “the leadership of OWD wouldn't look me in the eye. And now I'm an outcast because I spoke up about being sexually harassed by one of the higher ups.” Alexandra says that in the communication that she got back after she resigned there was no remorse about what happened to her.

 “I don't see any future for YAL if they're going to continue to hire a known sexual harasser. College age girls believe in YAL and what it stands for, but they are not there to stand up for us,” Alexandra says. I do believe that leadership can alter how they handle sexual harassment. My goal here is not to burn bridges with Griess and other YAL leadership. My goal is to show where their bridge is rickety, and hope that they fix it. I sincerely hope that YAL can change for the better.


I reached out to Young Americans for Liberty on September 29th for comment and they have not responded.

Alexandra has also reached out to YAL about John’s continued employment. She is still waiting for the call back from their Human Resources Department.


Popular posts from this blog

The Economics of BTC Maximalism

BTC maximalism is a flawed doctrine, fallacious in numerous respects.  First, if you'd prefer to hear these arguments in audio, check out this recent episode of ABNP , where @mrpseu & I discused these same topics.  Also, a qualifier: I'm not capable of making, defending or refuting technical arguments. I'll leave that aspect of the debate to others. My concerns with BTC maximalism are entirely economic and can be divided into four areas.  Based on the criteria for saleability as laid out by the austrian school, BTC is not the most marketable digital commodity. A lack of portability relative to other cryptocurrencies implies BTC isn't as sound of a commodity.  Value storage is a secondary function of money and cannot satisfy the use-value requirement of regression theorem.  BTC maximalism lays waste to the Hayekian notion of competition as a discovery procedure. This final point was addressed in detail on episode 50 of The Agora, Crypto-Economics

Weathering With You: An Agorist Perspective

If someone asked you what your favorite emotion was, how do you think you’d answer? For many people, I suspect they would answer “Happiness”, “Joy'', or some variant of exclusively positive emotion. Someone may think more meticulously and answer with “Contentment”, which while a positive emotion has a lot of nuance attached to it. However my answer to that question is what I feel others would consider more orthodox: Bittersweet. Pleasure accompanied by suffering, not exactly most people’s first pick but from my perspective pain is necessary in order to enjoy the pleasure that life gives you. Perhaps I'm over-romanticizing but there’s something to desire from looking back fondly at times where you were hurting and seeing yourself in a better place in the present. Perhaps you finally have moved on from “The one who got away” and can look back on those times with fondness. Perhaps you are sharing stories of a friend or family member at their funeral and though they may never w

5 Simple Ways to Support the Counter-Economy

Even if you aren’t prepared to engage in radical counter-economics, there are small steps everyone can take to either participate in, or at a minimum, support the counter-economy. I’ve assembled a list of 5 simple ways everyday people can participate in the agorist revolution. Food Trucks Food trucks not only often have excellent food, but they can also help push back against the state. In what is normally a cash business, food truck operators are better positioned to hide income from the state than other vendors such as chain grocery stores. Also, the more amateur the operation, the more likely the vendor is unlicensed; see the 7 year old NY child-slave, who’s lemonade stand was shut down by emissaries from Emperor Cuomo. Given the grey market dominance of the food truck business, it’s no wonder we’ve seen the industry blossom over the past couple decades. Food trucks have progressed from the standard roach coach to the present diverse array of taco trucks, gr