Skip to main content

Weathering With You: An Agorist Perspective

If someone asked you what your favorite emotion was, how do you think you’d answer? For many people, I suspect they would answer “Happiness”, “Joy'', or some variant of exclusively positive emotion. Someone may think more meticulously and answer with “Contentment”, which while a positive emotion has a lot of nuance attached to it. However my answer to that question is what I feel others would consider more orthodox: Bittersweet. Pleasure accompanied by suffering, not exactly most people’s first pick but from my perspective pain is necessary in order to enjoy the pleasure that life gives you. Perhaps I'm over-romanticizing but there’s something to desire from looking back fondly at times where you were hurting and seeing yourself in a better place in the present. Perhaps you finally have moved on from “The one who got away” and can look back on those times with fondness. Perhaps you are sharing stories of a friend or family member at their funeral and though they may never w

The Underlying Problem with Young Americans For Liberty


The Underlying Problem with Young Americans For Liberty


Derrell McIver

Warning: This article includes discussion and description of sexual harassment.


“Political power is not being chummy with politicians. To effect real change, you have to threaten a politician's power.” -anonymous

This is a very difficult article for me to write. Going into college, I did not know how of any political organization that shared my values of Liberty. That was until I helped in the founding of a Young Americans for Liberty chapter and became a dues-paying-member. After a brief interest in the Libertarian Party, I realized that YAL and its associated organizations were the best chance we have at seeing Liberty in politics in our lifetimes.

Some people will read this article and call it “cancel culture.” That is not the intent. For that very reason, I have not included the name of the sexual harasser. Instead he will be given the name ‘John’. My goal here is to call out the leaders of Young Americans because I believe that its leaders can genuinely change for the better.

The problem with YAL began on a campaign that I worked on under the leadership of Justin Greiss, YAL’s President of Grassroots. Greiss has also been the lead on Operation Win at the Door. My direct supervisor--and Greiss’s underling--attempted to have an unwanted sexual relationship with my coworker, Alexandra. I witnessed inappropriate and clearly unwanted flirting, both verbal and physical. The harassment started early on. Alexandra said that John was immediately flirty, even before the job started. John apparently singled out Alexandra to drive back to the place we stayed at for the campaign. During this ride, he made unsolicited comments about Tinder, finding and “super-liking” Alexandra’s profile. He told her to raise her age on the app so that she could also find his profile, something she did not feel comfortable rejecting because of the pressure he put on her. Alexandra says that she realized then that this would be a major issue.

Within the first few days, Alexandra and John were in the house alone after a day of work. Alexandra says that when she came out of her bedroom, John was changing in his room with the door open. She says that they made, “direct eye contact because the rooms [were] right across from each other. And he just stare[d] at me and winked while he’s getting undressed.” Alexandra said that when one of the other coworkers got home, she “had never been so thankful to see someone come through a door.”

John would also make comments about Alexandra’s body and appearance. He defended other men when Alexandra said they stared at her breast. He regularly insisted that she come back to his room and attempted to sext with her.  He would also enter the girls’ rooms unannounced and drunk. One time, he said it was rude to not invite him to the girls’ movie night. He began playing with Alexandra’s hair and touching her shoulders despite her saying that she did not want him in their room. When I asked her about these actions, she said they “made me uncomfortable with being a girl.” She noted that his regular drunkenness made her especially uncomfortable. John would continue to persist to not allow Alexandra time to be alone. These daily inappropriate actions caused anxiety for Alexandra.

After a while, the stress and harassment from this unwanted attention caused her to abruptly leave the campaign.  Alexandra says that she was “in constant fear that something was going to happen to me” and that “I did not know what to do since he was my boss.” One of the last nights she was at the house, she was on the phone with her sister--telling her about how scared and uncomfortable she was--and John came in and touched her shoulders while saying he was there for her if she needed to talk. “He started to drink more,” which caused Alexandra to get very scared about what could happen. After weeks of harassment, Alexandra had to abruptly leave the campaign to escape the threatening situation. Alexandra also emailed YAL and OWD leadership to report the harassment when she resigned.

While Alexandra’s experience on the first half of the campaign was horrible, at the time I believed that it was a fluke. Clearly a group of people so devoted to Liberty would not tolerate harassment in the workplace. This was confirmed to me and others by the immediate actions of YAL’s leaders. John was forced to resign and left a few days after Alexandra. New rules were established to prevent any more harassment and there were reassurances from leaders--including Griess himself--that employees could come to them for situations like this. The rest of us finished the campaign with a new vigor, believing that the issue was resolved.

That was until I began working for Mobilize the Message. Mobilize is a somewhat separate Liberty organization, but Justin Griess is one of its leaders. When I began work for them, my immediate boss was John: the person who had harassed my coworker, Alexandra. I was shocked. How could Griess allow the same person to have a similar influence over employees? Alexandra had the same questions when asked about her thoughts on the rehiring of a known sexual harasser:

I think it's really disrespectful and ridiculous. He's not in charge of people in the sense that he's living in the same house [like he was during the campaign], so hopefully he won't harass again. But it looks so bad for this fantastic organization just because they can't fire a dude who harassed his employees.

Alexandra, though, did not even have the same initial reassurances as I did from leadership. At a different event a couple months after the campaign, Alexandra says that, “the leadership of OWD wouldn't look me in the eye. And now I'm an outcast because I spoke up about being sexually harassed by one of the higher ups.” Alexandra says that in the communication that she got back after she resigned there was no remorse about what happened to her.

 “I don't see any future for YAL if they're going to continue to hire a known sexual harasser. College age girls believe in YAL and what it stands for, but they are not there to stand up for us,” Alexandra says. I do believe that leadership can alter how they handle sexual harassment. My goal here is not to burn bridges with Griess and other YAL leadership. My goal is to show where their bridge is rickety, and hope that they fix it. I sincerely hope that YAL can change for the better.


I reached out to Young Americans for Liberty on September 29th for comment and they have not responded.

Alexandra has also reached out to YAL about John’s continued employment. She is still waiting for the call back from their Human Resources Department.


Popular posts from this blog

The Truth About Global Warming

Libertarians who deny the existence of global warming run the risk of making us all look like a bunch of illiterate fools. Much like economics, being ignorant of planetology or climate science isn't a crime, but having a "loud and vociferous" opinion on the subject while remaining in a state of ignorance can be a dangerous thing. And frankly, the science behind climate change is elementary. Sunlight enters our atmosphere and warms our planet. Earth then gives off that heat in the form of infrared radiation (this is the same principle behind those cool goggles our collapsitarian friends have). However, and this is a crucial point - the CO₂ molecules in our atmosphere do not allow IR to easily escape back into space. This is known as the greenhouse effect. As the temperature of the planet increases, polar ice caps melt and eventually surface water will begin to evaporate. Since H₂0 also prevents IR from escaping our atmosphere, the additional water vapor only compound

The Counter-Economics of COVID

In March 2020 - some say earlier, but by March 2020 at latest - the banking had sector collapsed. In response, coronavirus was manufactured as a scapegoat to justify the liquidity injection necessary to keep the Federal Reserve’s ponzi scheme alive. The State’s narrative would henceforth be: ‘Since all businesses were shut down, an unprecedented amount of money must be printed and distributed to the public.’ Milton Friedman’s helicopter money had come to fruition. But like a junkie chasing his initial high, the Fed had become immune to the effects of monetary stimulus. Each injection requiring a stronger, more potent dose of cheap & easy money. Less than two years later, and the effects of that stimulus have now waned & the banksters are poised to pull off another heist. As the business cycle continues to ebb and flow until the day of final reckoning, the State can be expected to behave in an increasingly erratic fashion. Like a cornered cat, or a fish out of water, the State

The Trouble With Dave Smith

  On the issues, Dave & most agorists can find agreement 99 out of 100 times, but as libertarians we have a habit, a pastime - a duty even, to seek out & argue over the 1% of things we don’t agree on. In keeping with that tradition friends, I've got to tell you, when it comes to strategy, Dave Smith seriously fumbles the ball. The fundamental issue is that @comicdavesmith is interested in creating libertarians, whereas agorists are interested in creating liberty. Dave has a classic case of @perbylund ’s Savior Complex - the irrational desire of individualists to save the collective whole of society. There are lots of problems with this, but even if creating libertarians is a worthy goal, does that mean the Libertarian Party is the best vehicle to accomplish this task? Has anything the Libertarian Party ever done caused even a slight retreat of statism? Dave rightly points to his own success at spreading the message of liberty. It's true, no one - save Ron Paul or Tom