Skip to main content

Weathering With You: An Agorist Perspective

If someone asked you what your favorite emotion was, how do you think you’d answer? For many people, I suspect they would answer “Happiness”, “Joy'', or some variant of exclusively positive emotion. Someone may think more meticulously and answer with “Contentment”, which while a positive emotion has a lot of nuance attached to it. However my answer to that question is what I feel others would consider more orthodox: Bittersweet. Pleasure accompanied by suffering, not exactly most people’s first pick but from my perspective pain is necessary in order to enjoy the pleasure that life gives you. Perhaps I'm over-romanticizing but there’s something to desire from looking back fondly at times where you were hurting and seeing yourself in a better place in the present. Perhaps you finally have moved on from “The one who got away” and can look back on those times with fondness. Perhaps you are sharing stories of a friend or family member at their funeral and though they may never w

Degenerate Agorism

Of course cultural degeneracy shouldn’t be “normalized.”

The fact is, the recent conversation propelled by some right-libertarians has been entirely fallacious from the get-go.

Cultural decline is the direct result of central bankers manipulating the rate of interest & in no way justifies the initiation of force on otherwise peaceful people.

It helps to understand the root causes of social phenomena. Degeneracy is a function of time preference. Those with a high time preference generally place a higher value on present conditions than future conditions. These folks are more likely to engage in risky behavior like drug use, sexual promiscuity, & binge eating - preferring present satisfaction over the long term consequences of their behavior.

In contrast, those with a lower time preference place a higher value on future conditions than present conditions. Since adults with children have a vested interest in future conditions, they tend to fall in this category. Also, since consumption delay is necessary to save the capital required to start a business, entrepreneurship is said to be a low-time preference activity as well. Attending religious services is another example, since the pious prefer to sacrifice the present Sabbath for the (hopefully) much later reward of eternal salvation.

In truth, there’s always a premium on present conditions. That is to say, we all prefer to consume now rather than later, since we may not even be around later on! What I’m trying to say is that consumption delay is an inherently risky activity & it is precisely this risk which is being rewarded with favorable conditions in the future.

All of this however comes undone when central bankers begin manipulating the rate of interest. When the interest rate is artificially lowered, the money supply increases, credit expands and the cost of money comes down. Since money seems more abundant than it actually is, people readjust their time preference. The costs associated with present consumption comes down, and the risk associated with saving appears exacerbated.

By increasing the supply of money, central bankers artificially induce a high time preference on individuals.

Perhaps I’ve grown conspiratorial, but it all seems by design. The state has a vested interest in a financially dependent population. Not to mention, the social safety nets that accompany cultural decline have provided the excuses needed to usher in the modern police-surveillance state.

Now, what of the right-libertarian campaign to vilify the degenerate?

First, as we’ve seen, the real culprits behind cultural decay are the central banksters infesting Wall Street, not the homeless man sleeping on your local park bench, or the sex worker trying to feed her family. The latter are victims, and no libertarian position - indeed, no moral position - can support the initiation of force upon them.

The only response - the consistent, agorist response - is to utilize alternative currencies in order to become your own bank. Simply put, stop using central bank notes! By switching your primary medium of exchange to sound money alternatives, you will incur upon yourself a host of benefits you never knew existed, all of which flow from having a lower time preference.

Check out this article I wrote - How I Became My Own Bank and How You Can Too

To summarize, the right-libertarian vilification of those with alternative lifestyles is misdirected. The true malefactor, the supervillain in this tragedy, is the same today as it has been since Act One - the Federal Reserve.

And the only way to stop the Federal Reserve is through agorism.


  1. Basically it’s the demoralization that has taken place in America, according to the communist invasion stratagem.
    The “Four Stages of Ideological Subversion,” have unfolded before our eyes and we are witnessing now the manifestation of the results this operation happening in real time. The Demoralization, Destabilization, Crises, and Normalization continuum has been in revolution in our country for over 50 years.
    This degenerate cultural decline is the product of this invasion.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Truth About Global Warming

Libertarians who deny the existence of global warming run the risk of making us all look like a bunch of illiterate fools. Much like economics, being ignorant of planetology or climate science isn't a crime, but having a "loud and vociferous" opinion on the subject while remaining in a state of ignorance can be a dangerous thing. And frankly, the science behind climate change is elementary. Sunlight enters our atmosphere and warms our planet. Earth then gives off that heat in the form of infrared radiation (this is the same principle behind those cool goggles our collapsitarian friends have). However, and this is a crucial point - the CO₂ molecules in our atmosphere do not allow IR to easily escape back into space. This is known as the greenhouse effect. As the temperature of the planet increases, polar ice caps melt and eventually surface water will begin to evaporate. Since H₂0 also prevents IR from escaping our atmosphere, the additional water vapor only compound

The Counter-Economics of COVID

In March 2020 - some say earlier, but by March 2020 at latest - the banking had sector collapsed. In response, coronavirus was manufactured as a scapegoat to justify the liquidity injection necessary to keep the Federal Reserve’s ponzi scheme alive. The State’s narrative would henceforth be: ‘Since all businesses were shut down, an unprecedented amount of money must be printed and distributed to the public.’ Milton Friedman’s helicopter money had come to fruition. But like a junkie chasing his initial high, the Fed had become immune to the effects of monetary stimulus. Each injection requiring a stronger, more potent dose of cheap & easy money. Less than two years later, and the effects of that stimulus have now waned & the banksters are poised to pull off another heist. As the business cycle continues to ebb and flow until the day of final reckoning, the State can be expected to behave in an increasingly erratic fashion. Like a cornered cat, or a fish out of water, the State

The Trouble With Dave Smith

  On the issues, Dave & most agorists can find agreement 99 out of 100 times, but as libertarians we have a habit, a pastime - a duty even, to seek out & argue over the 1% of things we don’t agree on. In keeping with that tradition friends, I've got to tell you, when it comes to strategy, Dave Smith seriously fumbles the ball. The fundamental issue is that @comicdavesmith is interested in creating libertarians, whereas agorists are interested in creating liberty. Dave has a classic case of @perbylund ’s Savior Complex - the irrational desire of individualists to save the collective whole of society. There are lots of problems with this, but even if creating libertarians is a worthy goal, does that mean the Libertarian Party is the best vehicle to accomplish this task? Has anything the Libertarian Party ever done caused even a slight retreat of statism? Dave rightly points to his own success at spreading the message of liberty. It's true, no one - save Ron Paul or Tom