Skip to main content

Weathering With You: An Agorist Perspective

If someone asked you what your favorite emotion was, how do you think you’d answer? For many people, I suspect they would answer “Happiness”, “Joy'', or some variant of exclusively positive emotion. Someone may think more meticulously and answer with “Contentment”, which while a positive emotion has a lot of nuance attached to it. However my answer to that question is what I feel others would consider more orthodox: Bittersweet. Pleasure accompanied by suffering, not exactly most people’s first pick but from my perspective pain is necessary in order to enjoy the pleasure that life gives you. Perhaps I'm over-romanticizing but there’s something to desire from looking back fondly at times where you were hurting and seeing yourself in a better place in the present. Perhaps you finally have moved on from “The one who got away” and can look back on those times with fondness. Perhaps you are sharing stories of a friend or family member at their funeral and though they may never w

Finding Your Voice




Here we go again. Another article I’m writing because of a situation that happened recently. I swear, I have some half finished stuff and other ideas that are just sitting in my docs. Maybe this is just how the format will go. Something happens, and I come here to vent. Hey, it's cheaper than therapy.

Anyway, I went out to the bar the other night with my wife around 10 p.m. Something we rarely do anymore. I’m the guy who leaves the bar way before 10. But my wife wanted to see a friend she hasn't seen in a while. We get there and local pod. is all over the bar. It doesn't take long for my wife to say something to her friend akin to, “oh, my husband hates the police.” I'll give you 3 guesses what happens next, but you probably one need one. Yes, my wife’s friend starts up a conversation with one of the cops. Well, after a little awkwardness, we enjoyed the rest of night and got home way too late.

This stuff happens all the time to me. I have a bunch of family and friends in the business of violating rights. Lots of awkward moments. I never shy away from the topic of liberty, but I found that I’d become more reserved. Sometimes, I got angry with myself for not being more assertive. I use to think I was a fraud.


I constantly think of the repercussions of my conversations. Will this person never speak to me again? Will that person no longer be friends with my wife because of me? How will this affect my job? If remaining quiet at every turn makes me a fraud, can I accept that? The answer is no, but can I balance my personality with my beliefs and views?

Maybe I was a fraud, or maybe a better word is scared. Not just on this topic either. On many of the staples of libertarianism. I felt like I flew my flag in secret sometimes because I wasn't starting arguments every chance I got. To be fair I sometimes even hid my views. People made me think I was an extremist, crazy, or wanted to see the world burn. I was always in fear of being judged for my political views instead of being judged for who I am as a person; and fearing what type of impact that would have on my life both socially, and professionally.

As I came into my own, I became more outraged with the way things are and I started to speak up. Started to find my voice. I realized my style was more of the low key, lets talk about it type. A friend recently told me its best sometimes to give the statists their steak in bite size pieces until they are ready to sit down for dinner.

This style isn't for everyone - we need people to be out front and yelling, but I also feel like we need people like me. I try and argue the simple points, the most obvious points. If I can get them to see things from a new angle, then maybe they’ll come back for more. I fly my flag proudly now, and I'll talk to anyone (who wants to listen) about human rights issues. But I do it in my own style, and I no longer feel like the fraud I once thought I was.


When preaching the cause of liberty, my go to argument is this:

I don’t believe in crimes that don't have victims. I believe they are unconstitutional. I believe that people who choose an occupation violating these rights, are choosing to do just that. This makes them as bad as the laws they’re enforcing. By some accounts, the police are the criminals, and we are the victim of their extortion.

That’s just my icebreaker. An opener. What I really want to say has more to do with killing dogs, domestic violence rates and shooting innocent people. My hope is that my initial comment is that first bite of steak, and maybe, it will be good enough to make the statists want to sit down for dinner.


~Marcelo

Side note: Little Brother is a great book by Corey Doctorow which has similar concepts going on. His main character Marcus Yallow, struggles with doing and saying what he believes in and the consequences that my come with it. It involves much more exciting and extreme shit, but still it's a great read and I recommend it. In the same series I would also recommend a follow up book called Homeland.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Truth About Global Warming

Libertarians who deny the existence of global warming run the risk of making us all look like a bunch of illiterate fools. Much like economics, being ignorant of planetology or climate science isn't a crime, but having a "loud and vociferous" opinion on the subject while remaining in a state of ignorance can be a dangerous thing. And frankly, the science behind climate change is elementary. Sunlight enters our atmosphere and warms our planet. Earth then gives off that heat in the form of infrared radiation (this is the same principle behind those cool goggles our collapsitarian friends have). However, and this is a crucial point - the CO₂ molecules in our atmosphere do not allow IR to easily escape back into space. This is known as the greenhouse effect. As the temperature of the planet increases, polar ice caps melt and eventually surface water will begin to evaporate. Since H₂0 also prevents IR from escaping our atmosphere, the additional water vapor only compound

The Counter-Economics of COVID

In March 2020 - some say earlier, but by March 2020 at latest - the banking had sector collapsed. In response, coronavirus was manufactured as a scapegoat to justify the liquidity injection necessary to keep the Federal Reserve’s ponzi scheme alive. The State’s narrative would henceforth be: ‘Since all businesses were shut down, an unprecedented amount of money must be printed and distributed to the public.’ Milton Friedman’s helicopter money had come to fruition. But like a junkie chasing his initial high, the Fed had become immune to the effects of monetary stimulus. Each injection requiring a stronger, more potent dose of cheap & easy money. Less than two years later, and the effects of that stimulus have now waned & the banksters are poised to pull off another heist. As the business cycle continues to ebb and flow until the day of final reckoning, the State can be expected to behave in an increasingly erratic fashion. Like a cornered cat, or a fish out of water, the State

The Trouble With Dave Smith

  On the issues, Dave & most agorists can find agreement 99 out of 100 times, but as libertarians we have a habit, a pastime - a duty even, to seek out & argue over the 1% of things we don’t agree on. In keeping with that tradition friends, I've got to tell you, when it comes to strategy, Dave Smith seriously fumbles the ball. The fundamental issue is that @comicdavesmith is interested in creating libertarians, whereas agorists are interested in creating liberty. Dave has a classic case of @perbylund ’s Savior Complex - the irrational desire of individualists to save the collective whole of society. There are lots of problems with this, but even if creating libertarians is a worthy goal, does that mean the Libertarian Party is the best vehicle to accomplish this task? Has anything the Libertarian Party ever done caused even a slight retreat of statism? Dave rightly points to his own success at spreading the message of liberty. It's true, no one - save Ron Paul or Tom