Skip to main content

Technological Agorism Part III: AI & the Agora

There are two types of artificial intelligence: the rules-based, & the neural network-based approach. To illustrate the differences, I'll borrow an example from AI blogger Janelle Shane's book, You Look Like A Thing & I Love You, & pretend we're training an AI to recognize dogs.



Using a rules-based approach, we’d create parameters which the AI would then use to determine whether or not the thing it’s looking at, is in fact a dog. Our rules would include things like “must have four legs” & “must have tail,” etc. When all of our conditions have been satisfied, the AI will recognize a dog.

With a neural network-based approach, we show the AI images of dogs & it learns to recognize patterns. The more pictures of dogs we show it, the more accurate the AI becomes. Nowadays, this is usually the preferred approach & will be the subject of this article.

The interesting thing about the neural-network approach to AI - as we’ve already noted, is its reliance …

The Power of the Good Neighbor



Spring evening somewhere in Oslo, birdsong and
children playing as the only background music.

The individualistic thought world; breaking down groups and geographical areas into smaller and smaller components until you hit the fundamental building block of society - The single person - and from there, zoom out and see families, neighborhoods, parts of the city, larger metropolitan areas, the nation and beyond. 

In theory, when you take the individualistic view its easier to hone in on the elements you want to surround yourself with and expose your family to. Connect with like-minded people and create a positive atmosphere for growth and prosperity, whatever your values might be. The advantages to surround yourself with like-minded individuals is especially important for any aspiring Gray-marketeers (Agorists) that seeks to dodge any government rules and regulations.

But, when we look on a modern city-state of today you would have to get over many hurdles to design a "perfect" neighborhood consisting of people with an as-close-as-possible view of culturally accepted behavior in the general area of what we can call home. Not impossible, but more often than not you are playing a game on Hard-mode and have to accept some forms of compromises.

With ever decreasing property rights in favor of public/government control elements added to the mix, the top-down control on communities, families and lastly the individual settlement gets more and more restrictive and oppressive. [1]

As the saying goes, "one bad apple spoils the bunch", or in other terms, one bad neighbor can really split the community. If you can't control how to handle this bad apple, if any negotiation doesn't leave you the option to make it costly to do bad stuff next door in some form, you risk having it spread and set a new tone contrary to the ideals of you and your neighbors.

"and while the principle [of live and let live] does indeed hold and apply for people living far apart and dealing with each other only indirectly and from afar, it does not hold and apply, or rather it is insufficient, when it comes to people living in close proximity to each other, as neighbors and cohabitants of the same community." - Hans-Herman Hoppe


Much can be said on the topic of the 'Bad Neighbor Problem', indeed, but the topic of the Good Neighbor is much more interesting to me at this time and particularly how powerful it is to both be and have Good Neighbors.

Cheaper security transactions (and predictability of behavior as an added bonus to that) is a fundamental advantage of surrounding yourself with like-minded people. If close proximity isn't possible, the second best thing is having a well-made network of people. If you are, for example, a gray-marketeer that rather barter with your peers for goods and services and opt to cut out the unnecessary middleman that is government bureaucracy and taxation you always run a risk of getting exposed to agents of the state. If you have Good Neighbors that are on the same page in regards to your principles the risk of getting caught for something the state considers a crime is at a minimum.

"Try to influence your friends to speak appropriately by your example. If you find yourself in unfamiliar company, however, keep quiet." - Epictetus, advicing 21st century Gray Marketeers

When someone says "security", it is very easy to fall into the trap of thinking about arming yourself and having a bulletproof vest on a coat hanger, but security, at its core, is much more in the lines of trust - If you can trust your Good Neighbor (or your network), the need for swords and shield are much lower. Your inner circle should form a wall of trust [2] and allow everyone associated to fly under the radar, together. Sooner or later, security measures have to be invested in somehow, either in the form of firewalls for your computer, arms for your hands or camouflaging your business against any snooping eyes, but the first and reasonable step is to build that wall of trust with your fellows. [3]

Pooling of resources with others is a great way to accelerate prosperity. With a, sort-of, shared economy mindset of tools and knowledge you can overcome temporary hurdles - I could invest some money in specialized tools, or borrow my Good Neighbor's and allowing me to add to the pool of resources by buying equipment we lack between us instead. Makes more sense right?

One of the largest obstacles I've encountered (that I've 'solved', using the word very loosely here) is space - Since I live in a concrete box four stories above ground, with a cramped balcony and not much space in general for what I want to grow one of my limiters is space, and it will stay that way for quite some time. Tall plants or wheat is absolutely out of the question. What I've done to resolve this issue?


I've started recruiting "Growing buddies", friends and co-workers that like to grow a little bit of stuff in their spare time, but they plant a maximum of 1-2 of each crop that I want? I just offer them some of my harvest for them to double their amount of plants. Totally doable for both parts: Basil and mint requires very little in term of space they need to grow and if I can trade some of that for something that takes up twice the space, I've won some inches. For them, watering and caring for 4 plants isn't that much more work than taking care of 2. They don't really know they are participating in the gray market and help me out with ingredients for wine or beer production in a closet.

Those few who do know what I'm doing with the raw materials gladly share some of their with me, witch means a bottle for them and 2 bottles of some good brew for me. If you get to know someone with more fruit (apples, strawberries and the like)  or honey than they can possibly use, you are in a great spot to turn some of it to beverages and share some with them as payment. See how you don't actually need space for an apple tree in your living room anymore? [4] Division of labor hard at work!

You can imagine how great pooling your resources can be if you do it with one of your Good Neighbors, especially if they have some talents that overlap yours - One of my "growing buddies" is great at sales and have a huge web of people that like organic products and for a fee she is more than willing to share her friends with me.

"A Good Neighbor is a very desirable thing" - Thomas Jefferson

- Alex Utopium, editor at Utopim.blog. You can feed him some bitcoin, if you'd like.

___________________________________________
[1] A good article on this subject is Adam B. Summers "Your Home is Your Cottage" that does a great work explaining the specifics of the problem, from a more Rothbardian perspective.

[2] Sal wrote an excellent article on gated communities with plenty of food for thought on the physical aspect of shielding yourself from thieves and intruders of all stripes (statist or civilian).

[3] I'm still building my network, slowly, any gray marketers in Scandinavia that want to connect? My Twitter DM's are always open, or if you prefer email: utopiumstimulant @ gmail.com

[4] Jack Spirko is a true wizard when it comes to stuff like this, I highly recommend listening to Pete Raymond's podcast episode with him on Gray Market Anarchism, it is a real treat if you like these kinds of ideas!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Economics of BTC Maximalism

BTC maximalism is a flawed doctrine, fallacious in numerous respects. 

First, if you'd prefer to hear these arguments in audio, check out this recent episode of ABNP, where @mrpseu & I discused these same topics. 

Also, a qualifier: I'm not capable of making, defending or refuting technical arguments. I'll leave that aspect of the debate to others. My concerns with BTC maximalism are entirely economic and can be divided into four areas. 


Based on the criteria for saleability as laid out by the austrian school, BTC is not the most marketable digital commodity.A lack of portability relative to other cryptocurrencies implies BTC isn't as sound of a commodity. Value storage is a secondary function of money and cannot satisfy the use-value requirement of regression theorem. BTC maximalism lays waste to the Hayekian notion of competition as a discovery procedure. This final point was addressed in detail on episode 50 of The Agora, Crypto-Economics and thus, isn't elabor…

Global Warming & Economics

Libertarians who deny the existence of global warming run the risk of making us all look like a bunch of illiterate fools.

Much like economics, being ignorant of planetology or climate science isn't a crime, but having a "loud and vociferous" opinion on the subject while remaining in a state of ignorance can be a dangerous thing. And frankly, the science behind climate change is elementary.

Sunlight enters our atmosphere and warms our planet. Earth then gives off that heat in the form of infrared radiation (this is the same principle behind those cool goggles our collapsitarian friends have). However, and this is a crucial point - the CO₂ molecules in our atmosphere do not allow IR to easily escape back into space. This is known as the greenhouse effect. As the temperature of the planet increases, polar ice caps melt and eventually surface water will begin to evaporate. Since H₂0 also prevents IR from escaping our atmosphere, the additional water vapor only compounds th…

Don't Vote for Alex

It is 2019 and in Norway, that means county and city-election year. You can vote for me, but this article is all about why you really shouldn't. [1] There are several ways to say 'No'. This is a story about the time I said 'Yes', what I will stay positive to and what I will be negative toward. 

"But it is immoral to support politicians to oppress us because they might relieve us one oppression" - Samuel Edward Konkin III


First of all, there is some explaining to do: In my last article on the New Libertarian I argued that party politics is a waste of time and that you could use that time more productive so this entire piece seems like its contradicting that one. It might, that is up to you to judge for yourself (and if you want a chat I'm very approachable on Twitter), but in my defense, I will highlight two things:

One: I'm not against solution-finding, culture-building or exchange of ideas. I can give no brighter example of this happening than the…