Skip to main content

Paradigm Shift

The old guard built this movement. Without them, it’s unlikely any of us would be aware that a liberty movement even exists! This alone is an accomplishment. And the history books will look favorably upon them for it - & justifiably so. Their preference for a political approach however, has been ineffective at bringing about liberty (just take a look around, if you’re still permitted). Progress hasn’t just stagnated, we’ve been losing ground rapidly. It’s time for a paradigm shift. One that moves away from the old way of thinking & instead focuses on teaching people how to opt out of corrupt systems & to build competing, market-based alternatives to state institutions. Like sports teams, ideas also get tired & worn out, old players retire, & new, fresh ideas take their place. In the world of ideas, when paradigm shifts occur, the old guard resists the change at first, but eventually comes around to seeing the benefits and virtues of the new way. This is how progres

It's Not Easy Being Green (New Deal)

Welp, it's Summer in Texas again. Needless to say it's hot as hell, but I'll take this moment to soak up this heat for the next 12 years while I can, because we don’t have a choice…because we’re all gonna die if we don’t… because of temperature…I won’t even say if it’s because it’s too damn hot, or too damn cold because depending on the day and what these progressive-democratic-socialist nuts think or feel, it could be either depending which way the wind blows (or if it’s blowing at all).

So my initial thoughts, as you might have already guessed, is that this thing is complete bull. If “climate change” or “global warming”, or whichever term they feel is more expedient at the time, was such a big deal, then it would be the only thing we’d hear about, everyone would be on board with this.

I don't think that our so-called leaders in power, or Americans for that matter, would be too quick to make the sacrifices necessary to save the planet. I could be wrong though, so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that:

People would totally stop buying and selling ocean front properties because they’re afraid of flooding from rising sea levels. We’d all stop driving our cars and riding bikes to work instead to prevent CO2 gasses because carpooling wouldn’t even be good enough. And by the way, Bob Murphy's studies show carbon actually promotes the growth of vegetation…so immediately, what the heck? Oh, and naturally politicians would cease the use of their private jets.

And of course, the U.S. would immediately stop its production of over 9 million barrels of oil a day and stop becoming the world leader in production. We'll just let the Saudis fill the gap. Maybe they’d go as far as to kill off their first borns to eliminate a heavier carbon footprint, because believe it or not, some people actually think that the Earth is warming because there are too many people on the planet. So what? Are you saying you want the human species to die out? Just stop breeding? Good luck telling that to the Catholics. No offense, Catholics. You walked right into that one. Lemme have a little fun in my moment of grief.

People will stop buying and selling baby wipes. Which I know they make flushable ones but to be COMPLETELY HONEST, I am a cheap ass, and buy the non-flushable ones. And I simply do not care if I am “damaging the environment” because frankly, I will commit a polar bear genocide JUST to be sure my ass is squeaky clean. Subjective value, BABY!

And of course, we’d stop all the wars and bring our troops home.

The bottom line is, if we really ever want to see a “change” or improvement in the environment, then we need to use the most efficient and productive methods that we currently have. This will spur innovation for better alternatives. Otherwise we’re taking steps backward.

But let’s be real, politicians don’t really care about the environment or what’s in our best interest similar to their approach to war. It doesn’t help the folks back home. Just specific players and industries. Just like FDR’s “New Deal”, It’s a BS excuse for the state to seize control of industry and individual liberty. Plus, the “new jobs” that will get created are just gonna be BS government jobs requiring little to no skill, making Americans ever more dependent on the state for financial stability. It’s just a continuation of how Progressives bought off the American people with free goodies. This is why Progressivism in an authoritarian, right-wing plot to destroy us all.

 The truth of the matter is, industry and economic prosperity, is the true enemy of the state. By embracing free markets and capitalism, growth is promoted on a large scale by creating more businesses to compete with one another. This competition leads to lower prices, and increases the standard of living for everyone by yielding higher quality of products, and ubiquitous choices. 

But just like taxes: when we do well for ourselves, we get punished by the government. To say that the Green New deal would do just that is an understatement.

This slimy piece of legislation is ironically a pollutant, both to Americans, and everyone in Washington, and no wonder everyone there voted "present". It's polluting economic, and social prosperity. To put it simply, if these pricks care about the environment so much, they’d end the military industrial complex… Uh-oh! No more big, bad bitches for Boeing and Lockheed to show off on MSNBC of who really “runs the world.” 

*Allow me to share some environmental catastrophes due to the MIC below*

   *Updated as of January 14, 2019*

Habitat Destruction and Refugees

Viet Nam - 
  • U.S. forces sprayed herbicides Agent Orange on the forests and mangrove swamps that provided cover to guerrilla soldiers. 
    USAF spraying Agent Orange over
  • est. 20 million gallons of herbicide were used, decimating about 4.5 million acres in the countryside. Some regions are not expected to recover for several decades.
  • warfare causes the mass movement of people = catastrophic impacts
  • Widespread deforestation, unchecked hunting, soil erosion, and contamination of land and water by human waste occur when thousands of humans are forced to settle in a new area.
Invasive Species

  • Military ships, cargo airplanes, and trucks often ALSO carry non-native plants and animals to ride along with the soldiers = invading new areas and wiping out native species in the process. (RATS)
  • Laysan Island in the Pacific Ocean rats nearly wiped out finch, rail, & brought in sandbur - an invasive plant that crowds out the native bunchgrass that local birds depend on for habitat.

Below are some more catastrophes from Lenntech.

Afghanistan Alone! 

2001’s Operation Enduring Freedom, the Genesis of the War on Terrorism (still happening today)

Suffered extensive damage to environment
  • many people suffered health effects from weapons applied to destroy enemy targets
  • estimated 10K villages, and their surrounding environments were destroyed
  • Safe drinking water declined, via destruction of water infrastructure and resulting leaks, bacterial contamination and water theft. 
  • Rivers/groundwater contaminated by poorly constructed landfills located near the sources

80% of Kabul residents lack secure access to clean water

Afghanistan had major forests watered by monsoons. 
  • During the war, Taliban members illegally trading timber in Pakistan destroyed much of the forest cover. 
  • US bombings and refugees in need of firewood destroyed much of what remained. Less than 2% of the country still contains a forest cover today.

 Bombs threaten much of the country’s wildlife. 
  • One the world’s important migratory thoroughfare leads through Afghanistan. 
  • The number of birds now flying this route has dropped by 85%. In the mountains many large animals such as leopards found refuge, but much of the habitat is applied as refuge for military forces now
  • Additionally, refugees capture leopards and other large animals and trade them for safe passage across the border.

Pollution from explosives entered air, soil and water.
  • One example is cyclonite, a toxic substance that may cause cancer
  • Rocket propellants deposited perchlorates, which damage the thyroid gland
  • Numerous landmines left behind in Afghan soils still cause the deaths of men, women and children today.

Increased Production

Even in regions not directly affected by warfare, increased production in manufacturing, agriculture and other industries that support a war effort can wreak havoc on the natural environment. *Are you listening, ladies that run the world?!?*

 During World War I, former wilderness areas of the United States came under cultivation for wheat, cotton, and other crops, while vast stands of timber were clear-cut to meet wartime demand for wood products. Timber in Liberia, oil in Sudan, and diamonds in Sierra Leone were all exploited by military factions. "These provide a revenue stream that is used to buy weapons," says Bruch.

But not even all of this is a good enough threat because as the article says, “in some cases, precision weapons and other technological advances can shield the environment by targeting key facilities, leaving other areas relatively unscathed. ‘You could make the argument that these weapons have the ability to minimize collateral damage.’ ” 
 - Geoffrey Dabelko, director of the Environmental Change and Security Program at the Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C.

So that just proves these MIC hawks are willing to take the risk and experiment with the technology they have to make war safer.  For a Neo-con, when it comes between the making more war toys and the price of damaging the environment, I’m sure they’d say once more, “the price is worth it.”

Now Neo-cons aren’t the ones behind this plan. AOC for sure isn’t, and even Koala Harris wants a “resolution” in Afghanistan (let's be honest, she's totally a cop). The Neo-cons who are actually in charge like Nancy Pelosi wouldn’t let this pass. But if you ask me, I think this is just a litmus test on all the stupid people in the country for the statists to really see what they could get away with (especially if the Democrats take home to 2020 election). With all the feel-good, lovey-dovey emotionalism that’s so tasty to the pee-brained millennials that are balls deep in student loan debt, how is that not an easy target for these statist parasites to suckle upon? How much of our lives and freedom could they take from us? They come pretty far as it is, and I don’t think they’re stopping any time soon. 


Popular posts from this blog

Dear America, I Won't Be Locking Down

Dear America I won’t be locking down, not that I ever did. And I don’t care about the arbitrary mandates of a geriatric pedophile with a history of dementia. I don’t wear the muzzle or social distance. Nor do I have any plans to start. I won’t be avoiding friends or family & I actively seek out large public gatherings. Needless to say, it’ll be a cold, cold day in hell before the government injects my living body with a foreign substance or keeps me from my family on Thanksgiving Day. You see, I knew from day one that COVID was a hoax. More specifically, when videos of Chinese people dropping dead in the streets were being broadcasted by Western propaganda outlets, it became clear this was essentially a soft coup. As a general rule, anything coming from the CCP should immediately be assumed to be intentionally falsified for malicious purposes. Friends, what has happened is obvious. The political cartel has manufactured a virus because fear enables them to seize power & furthers

In Defense of Left Libertarianism

Marx was right, but Marxism is stupid. Let me explain… Marx’s fundamental critique that the working class is being exploited by the upper class is true. This is so inherently obvious in the modern political climate that I find it bewildering the notion even needs defending. In fact, today, the working class has been so thoroughly exploited that they can now be more accurately termed the working poor . Go to Manhattan, the neoliberal shithole from whence I came - and try to find a worker who both lives & resides there. You can’t. There aren’t any. The elites have successfully used a combination of high taxes & a denial of civil liberties to expel the working class from their homes. Trust me, I am among the expelled. The anarcho-capitalist habit of turning a blind eye to class theory is a grave mistake, as it sweeps real concerns under the rug. In doing so they dismiss the plight of an enormous contingent of the public - labor. No, we agorists aren’t seeking an abandonment of met

Against the LP

Agorism has no room for politics.  The Agora & political institutions can coexist no more than a state of marriage & bachelorhood can coexist. Counter-economics & politicking are likewise mutually exclusive. Frankly, it should seem obvious that engaging in politics & anti-politics is contradictory & self-defeating. It wouldn’t make much sense to get chemo in the morning & smoke a pack of Marlboros in the evening, so why would one seek to destroy the government today, and empower it tomorrow?  Just as a chemist who tests a logically inconsistent theory will experience failure, so too will social scientists & revolutionaries experience failure when they pursue inconsistent theories.  Note that without exception - every gain made by the liberty community in the past 15 years has been produced by the counter-economy & that no other faction of our movement can claim even a small victory . Here’s a brief look at the scoreboard: Whereas the LP & small gov