Skip to main content

Weathering With You: An Agorist Perspective

If someone asked you what your favorite emotion was, how do you think you’d answer? For many people, I suspect they would answer “Happiness”, “Joy'', or some variant of exclusively positive emotion. Someone may think more meticulously and answer with “Contentment”, which while a positive emotion has a lot of nuance attached to it. However my answer to that question is what I feel others would consider more orthodox: Bittersweet. Pleasure accompanied by suffering, not exactly most people’s first pick but from my perspective pain is necessary in order to enjoy the pleasure that life gives you. Perhaps I'm over-romanticizing but there’s something to desire from looking back fondly at times where you were hurting and seeing yourself in a better place in the present. Perhaps you finally have moved on from “The one who got away” and can look back on those times with fondness. Perhaps you are sharing stories of a friend or family member at their funeral and though they may never w

Riots are Inevitable, Not Justified

Beginning Note: I do not condone the riots against or the looting of private citizens or private property. This is not a defense, it is an attempt at an explanation.

Across US cities, there have been protests to call for reform of the police and legal system that is responsible for the brutal murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. While the overwhelming majority of these have been peaceful events, much of the news coverage and government reaction has been in response to the rioting and looting that have become adjacent to the calls for justice.

Many are shocked at the almost complete breakdown of law in cities across the country. But these should not shock anyone. They are an inevitable product of our current legal system: a monopoly. The government and police claim to have a monopoly over the legitimate use of force, and when this monopoly is shown to be counterproductive to the preservation of law--that is the protection of person and private property--we can only expect chaos.

The police have shown that they are not here to protect you or your property. Most obviously, they have shown it by the brutal murder of George Floyd and the lethal ambush of Breonna Taylor. When protesters took to the streets to fight this injustice and demand reform, several police departments began to fire tear gas and rubber bullets into peaceful crowds exercising rights allegedly protected by the constitution. One video sent to me by a victim of tear gassing shows just that. The police have also shown that they are incapable and/or uninterested in protecting private property of local businesses once protests turn violent. Some have even suggested that the police were the one who started the riots using agent provocateur tactics. Others say that it was started by white nationalist or antifa. It is likely some combination of those three agents and natural, justified anger boiling over into unjustified violence. What is one to do when the monopoly fails to protect you and your property? When one Minnesota man tried to defend himself and his store by using deadly self defense, the police came and arrested him! They refuse to give up their monopoly of force even when it has deteriorated to having to protect their own murderers.

Much of this violence--both from the police system and the riots--have had a disproportionately negative effect on People of Color. 27% of fatal police shootings kill Black Americans when they represent only 13% of the entire US population. In fact, one Louisville protester was fatally shot by either the LMPD or the KY National Guard. There have been countless videos from local Black business owners who have seen their stores become the targets of chaos. One video shows a Muslim man named Hassan and his store after looters stole much of his inventory. An opinion piece in the Washington Examiner also argues that minorities are hit hardest by the looting.

What can we do to stop this from happening? Many have suggested political reform to curb the unaccountable police system we currently live in. Congressman Justin Amash of the Libertarian Party has proposed a bill that would “eliminate qualified immunity”. Cliff Maloney, President of Young Americans for Liberty, has said he will work for six real solutions. Others have called for mandatory liability insurance for police officers so that the taxpayer does not have to pay for the mistakes of the State and so that higher premiums will regulate ‘bad apples.’ All of these solutions are ideas that I support. I believe implementing these and other accountability measures will help to lessen police brutality. I hope to help these political solutions become realities.

But can we look beyond our political system for a solution? The heart of the problem is that the State exercises a monopoly on force. Imagine a system that lacked that inherent problem. For example, what if policing was done by competing insurance firms that did not have a monopoly on violence?

First, and most importantly, the firms would have no reason to use excessive force against their own customers. But what if a racist private police officer still used his power to murder? I cannot claim this would never happen. But from the start, it would be discouraged internally--whereas government police have an infamous internal protection. When the LMPD murdered Breonna Taylor, how many people could say, “You know what? I do not want to be policed by them anymore!” In a private system, media attention on killings would cause customers to switch from one firm to another, creating an incentive for police to be more refrained. Private police also would never have the shield of sovereign immunity.

Second, the firms would support local businesses if riots ever broke out. In the video of Hassan, he says that he has insurance but that repair and replacing will still be expensive. What if the insurance company was the one responsible for protecting his business? They would have an incentive to do this so that they do not have to cover claims. And they would certainly never have arrested the Minnesota man for protecting his own property!

We need solutions to the growing problem of unaccountable police. Some of these include political reform and I commend the work being done by those who are helping to get these passed. We should also consider more fundamental changes to our police system, though. It is clear that Americans are ready for change.

Derrell McIver @BenjaminDMyles1


Popular posts from this blog

The Truth About Global Warming

Libertarians who deny the existence of global warming run the risk of making us all look like a bunch of illiterate fools. Much like economics, being ignorant of planetology or climate science isn't a crime, but having a "loud and vociferous" opinion on the subject while remaining in a state of ignorance can be a dangerous thing. And frankly, the science behind climate change is elementary. Sunlight enters our atmosphere and warms our planet. Earth then gives off that heat in the form of infrared radiation (this is the same principle behind those cool goggles our collapsitarian friends have). However, and this is a crucial point - the CO₂ molecules in our atmosphere do not allow IR to easily escape back into space. This is known as the greenhouse effect. As the temperature of the planet increases, polar ice caps melt and eventually surface water will begin to evaporate. Since H₂0 also prevents IR from escaping our atmosphere, the additional water vapor only compound

The Counter-Economics of COVID

In March 2020 - some say earlier, but by March 2020 at latest - the banking had sector collapsed. In response, coronavirus was manufactured as a scapegoat to justify the liquidity injection necessary to keep the Federal Reserve’s ponzi scheme alive. The State’s narrative would henceforth be: ‘Since all businesses were shut down, an unprecedented amount of money must be printed and distributed to the public.’ Milton Friedman’s helicopter money had come to fruition. But like a junkie chasing his initial high, the Fed had become immune to the effects of monetary stimulus. Each injection requiring a stronger, more potent dose of cheap & easy money. Less than two years later, and the effects of that stimulus have now waned & the banksters are poised to pull off another heist. As the business cycle continues to ebb and flow until the day of final reckoning, the State can be expected to behave in an increasingly erratic fashion. Like a cornered cat, or a fish out of water, the State

The Trouble With Dave Smith

  On the issues, Dave & most agorists can find agreement 99 out of 100 times, but as libertarians we have a habit, a pastime - a duty even, to seek out & argue over the 1% of things we don’t agree on. In keeping with that tradition friends, I've got to tell you, when it comes to strategy, Dave Smith seriously fumbles the ball. The fundamental issue is that @comicdavesmith is interested in creating libertarians, whereas agorists are interested in creating liberty. Dave has a classic case of @perbylund ’s Savior Complex - the irrational desire of individualists to save the collective whole of society. There are lots of problems with this, but even if creating libertarians is a worthy goal, does that mean the Libertarian Party is the best vehicle to accomplish this task? Has anything the Libertarian Party ever done caused even a slight retreat of statism? Dave rightly points to his own success at spreading the message of liberty. It's true, no one - save Ron Paul or Tom